Anyone Good at Math? Help, please!
Dec. 8th, 2010 09:46 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have a guess and check story problem I am trying to figure out so I can help my son figure it out and all I am managing to do at the moment is bang my head against the wall. The problem is this:
Russell had just served up 55 cones, some single scoops, some double scoops, and some triple scoops. If he served up a total of 103 scoops, how many of the cones were single scoops, how many were double scoops, and how many were triple scoops?
Usually I figure out guess and checks algebraically, but I can't do that here because there is not enough information and I've gone through two pieces of scrap paper trying to figure it out otherwise. We didn't have bloody problems like this when I was in the fifth grade!
Russell had just served up 55 cones, some single scoops, some double scoops, and some triple scoops. If he served up a total of 103 scoops, how many of the cones were single scoops, how many were double scoops, and how many were triple scoops?
Usually I figure out guess and checks algebraically, but I can't do that here because there is not enough information and I've gone through two pieces of scrap paper trying to figure it out otherwise. We didn't have bloody problems like this when I was in the fifth grade!
no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 05:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 06:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 06:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 06:27 am (UTC)55x2=110, which is close enough to 103 to use it as a starting point. Then I just worked backwards. I tried 45x2, leaving 13 scoops over 10 cones. That math didn't work, but is very close, so I started working backwards from there. Turns out 44x2, 9x1, 2x3 = 103.
It's not an equation, but it's how I solved it. Does that help?
no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 06:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 07:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 09:38 am (UTC)(2x2) + (2x3) + (1x93) = 103
4 + 6 + 93
(2x5) + (3x5) + (1x78) = 103
10 + 15 + 78
And so on and so forth.
It seems to me like the problem is flawed. 1x + 2x + 3x = 103 doesn't work because you don't come up with one number that works for x. I suppose they could be looking for 1x + 2y + 3z = 103, but you still run into the same problem of multiple answers (they don't have a qualifier like find the maximum number of single, double, and triple scoops that equals 103).
no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 02:55 pm (UTC)10 + 15 + 78
I think you should go with this answer, but only because 10/15/78 is my birthday.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 12:15 pm (UTC)*edited because I just saw your son is in the 5th grade.
Kill me now....
no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 01:30 pm (UTC)x + y + z = 55
x + 2y + 3z = 103
There should be a third line here to make this a true system.
You'd be fine if they were only two variables. It's that third one that throws off the whole system.
That's my answer and I'm sticking to it. Otherwise I'll be entirely too nervous about my Modeling Algebra final on Tuesday.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 01:58 pm (UTC)The earlier comments are correct in that this is two equations in a system that, in order to have a unique solution, requires three.
x + y + z = 55
x + 2y + 3z = 103
With a bit of algebra you can rewrite this as
x = z +7 and
y = 48 - 2z
In other words, you can at least get x and y (one and two scoops) in terms of z (the number of three scoops). This may not seem to help but it does. Remember that x, y and z are all required to have non-negative and integer values (no fractions or decimals). Therefore z can't be smaller than zero, nor can it be larger than 24 (without forcing y to be negative).
A bit of work with a spreadsheet lists all possible solutions deriving from these (with z running from 0 to 24 and x and y derived from it). There may well be others - I'm two glasses of red wine down at the moment and not working to full capacity! *g*
no subject
Date: 2010-12-10 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-09 08:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-10 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-10 01:43 am (UTC)