ext_58356 ([identity profile] jayaydee.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] amberfocus 2008-09-06 12:49 pm (UTC)

This was not hot - it was volcanic! Amazing not-sex is amazing. I cannot praise your skills enough, and definitely agree with a commenter above that this goes beyond smut. Smut is quite often cheap and quick. The dictionary defines it as "indecent language or publications; obscenity" - this definitely does not hold true with your fiction.
I then looked up erotica. The definition? "Literature or art intended to arouse sexual desire". Bingo! Couldn't find a more fitting description (well, judging by the comments above, I'm not the only one who has been affected).

Bring on the erotica!


Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting